I figured Apple would make something like that soon and instead they're making a 27" version through LG which costs $999. The short version is I'd like a 5k 32+ inch monitor which is glossy and does not cost all of the money. I have also exchanged my (excellent) rain Design mStand for a Twelve South BookArc since I prefer using just 1 monitor. I vastly prefer 1 high resolution monitor rather than multiple lower-resolution monitors. I've owned other similar monitor setups, but this is my favorite so far. Previous to that, I had 2x Dell s2415H which had a beautiful design and glossy finish but were low resolution and fairly expensive for what they were. I've owned the dell p2715q previously which also had a matte finish AND was too small to use 4k easily. Also, the design is average (very limited adjustability and thicker bezel by today's standard). This seiki hits 3/4 but has an matte finish I don't love.
I'm always looking for a glossy, high-resolution, gigantic display at a low price. I've actually bounced around many monitors, none of which are even close to perfect imo. 32") is useable, which I wouldn't necessarily say for smaller sizes, like 27". Now there's a really nice looking 4k IPS monitor with 99% sRGB for $500 and I have to wonder if, other than the 60 FPS limit, there's a catch I'm just not seeing. To my recollection, only a few years ago a 1440p monitor with good color reproduction was pretty much the best you could get, and it would be at least $1000 or more. More or less, what I'm wondering about this monitor here is, it just sounds too good to be true for what the specs are saying. That, and having something a bit nicer all-around. I have a 970 as well, so it might manage 4k at 60FPS on some games, or if I turn down settings, but it's mostly the resolution and color quality that matter, IMO. Personally, I'm fine with capping at 60 FPS (and I do so by enabling Vsync even when I could get better framerates) and I'm fine with using less-than-max settings in games (like upscaling from a lower res) because this is mostly something I want for creative purposes. If I may piggyback off this question, what might the downsides of a monitor like this Dell (4k, IPS, similar price range) be? It has higher reviews, lower price, and a pretty sweet bezel as well. It looks like the Dell may be the better option here. a used one from amazon is about half the price of a 144hz gaming monitor. I personally bought a Dell P2715Q for the great color, 4k res, and the ability to connect my xbox. You also have to get a TN panel or pay a premium to get an IPS panel (TN has a faster response rate for less blur but IPS has much better colors). It allows you to play games at a true 144 FPS, but you have to have a GPU that can push your games at 144 FPS consistently. Regarding Monitors: 144Hz is a totally subjective benefit. If you are rarely or never going to do the above in a serious manner, buy the 6600k and spend the money on a nice pair of headphones, a keyboard, or a big IPS panel monitor something you will appreciate every time you use it. This boost would be nice to have but not crippling to miss out on in any means. If you ever are going to use your computer for multi threaded applications like 3d rendering, video editing, and CAD, the 6700k will give you a boost in performance that leads to time saved waiting for stuff to happen. HyperThreading to give you 8 cores instead of 4 cores (no effect on games) Upgrading from 6600k to 6700k will get you the following benefits:ĥ00Mhz extra base clock speeds and 300Mhz extra Turbo (irrelevant with overclocking)ĢMb extra 元 cache (Very little to zero impact on anything for personal use, this holds stuff so the cpu doesnt have to talk to the RAM)
0 kommentar(er)
